Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
The Scientific Method: A Guide to Finding Useful Knowledge
Purchase options and add-ons
- ISBN-101009096427
- ISBN-13978-1009096423
- PublisherCambridge University Press
- Publication dateJuly 14, 2022
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions6 x 0.5 x 8.75 inches
- Print length200 pages
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
From the Publisher
Editorial Reviews
Review
'From time to time, admirable human institutions lose their way and need reformation. As this important book makes clear, much contemporary science badly needs reformation. Scientists have been distracted from the honest, self-critical search for truth by careerism, ideology, and other lamentable forces. Too often ‘science’ has become well-funded propaganda for a political narrative. The book outlines what science should be, what problems contemporary science is facing, and how to fix them.' William Happer, Cyrus Fogg Bracket Professor of Physics, Emeritus, Princeton University
'This compact book challenges the status quo regarding what gets produced and published in the realm of science. The authors make clear why much research contributes nothing to scientific knowledge and how this situation can be changed by requiring checklists that focus the attention of stakeholders - journal editors, funding agencies, lawyers, regulators, the media, and scientists themselves - on the essential attributes of science, especially the consideration of alternative hypotheses. A compelling manifesto for how to make investment in science produce valid and useful results.' Geoffrey Kabat, Epidemiologist and author of Hyping Health Risks
'Contemporary science falls well short of its ideals for trustworthiness and usefulness. This book tells the truth, spotlighting shortcomings and corruption in scientific practice, and provides step-by-step guidance for baking integrity and value into our research and publication practices.' Denise M. Rousseau, H.J. Heinz II University Professor of Organizational Behavior and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University
Book Description
About the Author
Kesten C. Green researches and teaches at the University of South Australia.
Product details
- Publisher : Cambridge University Press (July 14, 2022)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 200 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1009096427
- ISBN-13 : 978-1009096423
- Item Weight : 12.7 ounces
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.5 x 8.75 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #127,040 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #242 in Business Decision Making
- #433 in Decision-Making & Problem Solving
- #2,921 in Unknown
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Scientific opinions are not science, one does not believe in science or scientists, the job of scientists is to lay out their research and results in such a clear and precise way as to make them objectively correct, there is no need to "believe" in anything. It should be clear, anything else is not scientific, it is opinion.
Chapter 7 is essential reading. It is clear that government funding of research has corrupted science, by selectively funding scientists that consistently produce the results that the political funders want. Further, by emphasizing government funding above all else both the quality of university education, and the public benefits of government research have been reduced. Universities should teach, not be money-generating machines.
Peer-reviews are dominated by the opinions of the reviewers and the editors of scientific journals and, of late, have censored, rather than review. The book offers other ways to publish significant work, rather than in peer-reviewed journals. It is unfortunate, but peer-reviewed journals are a failed experiment. The 19th century custom of self-publishing scientific results is better. Much more in the book, worth reading.
Advanced-level science training is very much like a medieval guild where the work can be very narrowly focused; as training advances, the big picture is usually well out of view. It is well-established that many scientific claims fail to replicate. About two-thirds of experimental psychology claims failed to replicate. Close to 90% of experimental biology claims failed to replicate. I examined 52 epidemiology claims and none of them replicated in randomized trials, 0/52. There is a problem. Armstrong and Green provide useful guidance on how to start turning the situation around. Their guidance comes complete with multiple checklists. I will add that my son is a commercial pilot with 30 years of experience flying all manner of planes. He uses checklists, as do all pilots. If science is to advance beyond guilds, expert opinion, and advocacy, then checklists and the reasoning for them are a good start.
Scientists, editors, and funding agencies should pay heed to this book. Citizens, who pay for much science, are forewarned that the science claim that appears with media cheerleading more than likely will not replicate.
Armstrong and Green are to be congratulated for their careful work and hopefully the start of turning the current often dismal situation around.
S. Stanley Young, Ph.D., FASA, FAAAS
Armstrong and Green, still at it, grinding their dull Heartland axe using advocacy "science":
* governments funded/regulated research = bad
* private corporation funded/self-regulated research = good
* the superiority of "necessary genes" to "demographic diversity" among scientists
* etc...
I am embarrassed that Cambridge University Press published this nonscience nonsense.
Google: "Heartland Institute"
Top reviews from other countries
As a scientist, I've been interested in the scientific method all my life, but I had to learn it the hard way, over many years of experimental practice from just a general understanding. I would have found a book like Armstrong and Green's "The Scientific Method" invaluable.
The book is divided into three parts. Chapters 2, 3, and 8 deal with the scientific method and what constitutes a good scientist. Chapters 4 to 7 identify some serious problems with the practice of science today. And chapters 9 to 11 propose ways of improving scientific practice.
The authors underscore the importance of objectivity for scientific progress. They also detail in chapter 5 the problem of advocacy, which has become acute with the utilization of science as a political tool. This is related to their defense of the scientific method versus scientists' opinions. Opinions by scientists do not constitute science despite the general belief that a scientific consensus is the best representation of scientific truth. Another interesting point in these times of extremely complex models guiding policies is the identification of complexity as a source of error.
This book is a nice, accessible addition to the philosophy of science following the steps of Karl Popper. The book's practical focus makes it more useful for science practitioners and those interested in the role of scientists in our society. If scientists are to have more voice (more power), it should come with more responsibility. Sadly, those that would benefit the most from this book are those that will not want to read it.
Reviewed in Spain on October 9, 2022
As a scientist, I've been interested in the scientific method all my life, but I had to learn it the hard way, over many years of experimental practice from just a general understanding. I would have found a book like Armstrong and Green's "The Scientific Method" invaluable.
The book is divided into three parts. Chapters 2, 3, and 8 deal with the scientific method and what constitutes a good scientist. Chapters 4 to 7 identify some serious problems with the practice of science today. And chapters 9 to 11 propose ways of improving scientific practice.
The authors underscore the importance of objectivity for scientific progress. They also detail in chapter 5 the problem of advocacy, which has become acute with the utilization of science as a political tool. This is related to their defense of the scientific method versus scientists' opinions. Opinions by scientists do not constitute science despite the general belief that a scientific consensus is the best representation of scientific truth. Another interesting point in these times of extremely complex models guiding policies is the identification of complexity as a source of error.
This book is a nice, accessible addition to the philosophy of science following the steps of Karl Popper. The book's practical focus makes it more useful for science practitioners and those interested in the role of scientists in our society. If scientists are to have more voice (more power), it should come with more responsibility. Sadly, those that would benefit the most from this book are those that will not want to read it.