$23.99 with 20 percent savings
List Price: $29.99

The List Price is the suggested retail price of a new product as provided by a manufacturer, supplier, or seller. Except for books, Amazon will display a List Price if the product was purchased by customers on Amazon or offered by other retailers at or above the List Price in at least the past 90 days. List prices may not necessarily reflect the product's prevailing market price.
Learn more
Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime FREE Returns
FREE delivery Monday, May 20 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35
Only 14 left in stock (more on the way).
$$23.99 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$23.99
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Ships from
Amazon.com
Ships from
Amazon.com
Sold by
Amazon.com
Sold by
Amazon.com
Returns
30-day easy returns
30-day easy returns
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt.
Returns
30-day easy returns
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt.
Payment
Secure transaction
Your transaction is secure
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Payment
Secure transaction
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

The Scientific Method: A Guide to Finding Useful Knowledge

3.7 3.7 out of 5 stars 10 ratings

{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"$23.99","priceAmount":23.99,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"23","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"99","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"irzV2tBEMNzcwOCoplBf2FP2Y1S7O0HCRRGwIrtZFJhsBfT%2FjsocK%2Br3nMJL%2FC4PSag5Jcbf5vuIxk3pgGBQbStvMbiZzKZuaS8%2FIpkGCwsMbdeLSkXpo34WJG1585Q10ufAp3Dg6zj2hE%2FMGA2J7g%3D%3D","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}]}

Purchase options and add-ons

The scientific method delivers prosperity, yet scientific practice has become subject to corrupting influences from within and without the scientific community. This essential reference is intended to help remedy those threats. The authors identify eight essential criteria for the practice of science and provide checklists to help avoid costly failures in scientific practice. Not only for scientists, this book is for all stakeholders of the broad enterprise of science. Science administrators, research funders, journal editors, and policymakers alike will find practical guidance on how they can encourage scientific research that produces useful discoveries. Journalists, commentators, and lawyers can turn to this text for help with assessing the validity and usefulness of scientific claims. The book provides practical guidance and makes important recommendations for reforms in science policy and science administration. The message of the book is complemented by Nobel Laureate Vernon L. Smith's foreword, and an afterword by Terence Kealey.
Read more Read less

Amazon First Reads | Editors' picks at exclusive prices

Frequently bought together

$23.99
Get it as soon as Monday, May 20
Only 14 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
+
$38.00
Get it as soon as Monday, May 20
Only 10 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Total price:
To see our price, add these items to your cart.
Details
Added to Cart
One of these items ships sooner than the other.
Choose items to buy together.

From the Publisher

Smith Quote
Rousseau Quote
Gigerenzer Quote
Happer Quote
Kabat Quote

Editorial Reviews

Review

'How does scientific practice differ from scientific method? What does it take to become a good scientist? How to write an excellent paper? In times where science must confront rumors and fake news and struggles with inept practices, this clearly written book is a timely and valuable resource. The authors provide how-to checklists, starting with an oath every scientist and journalist should take: to have read all the work they cite. I highly recommended this book to everyone who loves science.' Gerd Gigerenzer, Director of the Harding Center for Risk Literacy, Max Planck Institute for Human Development

'From time to time, admirable human institutions lose their way and need reformation. As this important book makes clear, much contemporary science badly needs reformation. Scientists have been distracted from the honest, self-critical search for truth by careerism, ideology, and other lamentable forces. Too often ‘science’ has become well-funded propaganda for a political narrative. The book outlines what science should be, what problems contemporary science is facing, and how to fix them.' William Happer, Cyrus Fogg Bracket Professor of Physics, Emeritus, Princeton University

'This compact book challenges the status quo regarding what gets produced and published in the realm of science. The authors make clear why much research contributes nothing to scientific knowledge and how this situation can be changed by requiring checklists that focus the attention of stakeholders - journal editors, funding agencies, lawyers, regulators, the media, and scientists themselves - on the essential attributes of science, especially the consideration of alternative hypotheses. A compelling manifesto for how to make investment in science produce valid and useful results.' Geoffrey Kabat, Epidemiologist and author of Hyping Health Risks

'Contemporary science falls well short of its ideals for trustworthiness and usefulness. This book tells the truth, spotlighting shortcomings and corruption in scientific practice, and provides step-by-step guidance for baking integrity and value into our research and publication practices.' Denise M. Rousseau, H.J. Heinz II University Professor of Organizational Behavior and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University

Book Description

A guide to identifying and practicing useful scientific research for researchers, administrators, policy makers, lawyers, and journalists.

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Cambridge University Press (July 14, 2022)
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Paperback ‏ : ‎ 200 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 1009096427
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1009096423
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 12.7 ounces
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6 x 0.5 x 8.75 inches
  • Customer Reviews:
    3.7 3.7 out of 5 stars 10 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Kesten C. Green
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Customer reviews

3.7 out of 5 stars
3.7 out of 5
10 global ratings

Top reviews from the United States

Reviewed in the United States on October 6, 2022
Perhaps it is because I was a scientist for 42 years, but I find the level of scientific education very poor these days. People say they "believe in science," even though such a statement is clearly an oxymoron. As the book makes clear, science done properly, is a method of discerning objective and reproducible truth. A scientific paper and study, properly documented, must be reproducible by others.

Scientific opinions are not science, one does not believe in science or scientists, the job of scientists is to lay out their research and results in such a clear and precise way as to make them objectively correct, there is no need to "believe" in anything. It should be clear, anything else is not scientific, it is opinion.

Chapter 7 is essential reading. It is clear that government funding of research has corrupted science, by selectively funding scientists that consistently produce the results that the political funders want. Further, by emphasizing government funding above all else both the quality of university education, and the public benefits of government research have been reduced. Universities should teach, not be money-generating machines.

Peer-reviews are dominated by the opinions of the reviewers and the editors of scientific journals and, of late, have censored, rather than review. The book offers other ways to publish significant work, rather than in peer-reviewed journals. It is unfortunate, but peer-reviewed journals are a failed experiment. The 19th century custom of self-publishing scientific results is better. Much more in the book, worth reading.
5 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on October 6, 2022
Several years ago, I read a pre-print of The Scientific Method by Armstrong and Green. I made extensive comments at the time and sent them to the authors. I assume other scientists read and made comments on the book. Recently, I purchased an e-version of the book and read the book again, noting many additions and improvements to the book.
Advanced-level science training is very much like a medieval guild where the work can be very narrowly focused; as training advances, the big picture is usually well out of view. It is well-established that many scientific claims fail to replicate. About two-thirds of experimental psychology claims failed to replicate. Close to 90% of experimental biology claims failed to replicate. I examined 52 epidemiology claims and none of them replicated in randomized trials, 0/52. There is a problem. Armstrong and Green provide useful guidance on how to start turning the situation around. Their guidance comes complete with multiple checklists. I will add that my son is a commercial pilot with 30 years of experience flying all manner of planes. He uses checklists, as do all pilots. If science is to advance beyond guilds, expert opinion, and advocacy, then checklists and the reasoning for them are a good start.
Scientists, editors, and funding agencies should pay heed to this book. Citizens, who pay for much science, are forewarned that the science claim that appears with media cheerleading more than likely will not replicate.
Armstrong and Green are to be congratulated for their careful work and hopefully the start of turning the current often dismal situation around.
S. Stanley Young, Ph.D., FASA, FAAAS
4 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2022
Their premise (use checklists) is sound, but ohhh their poorly-reasoned arguments and dog-whistle language.

Armstrong and Green, still at it, grinding their dull Heartland axe using advocacy "science":
* governments funded/regulated research = bad
* private corporation funded/self-regulated research = good
* the superiority of "necessary genes" to "demographic diversity" among scientists
* etc...

I am embarrassed that Cambridge University Press published this nonscience nonsense.

Google: "Heartland Institute"
7 people found this helpful
Report

Top reviews from other countries

Javier Vinós
5.0 out of 5 stars I wish this book was available at the start of my scientific career
Reviewed in Spain on October 9, 2022
Every scientist is convinced of his rationality, expertise, objectivity, and insight. However, studies demonstrate the general practice of science leaves much to be desired and, while being a general problem, in some fields it has resulted in a crisis of reproducibility.
As a scientist, I've been interested in the scientific method all my life, but I had to learn it the hard way, over many years of experimental practice from just a general understanding. I would have found a book like Armstrong and Green's "The Scientific Method" invaluable.

The book is divided into three parts. Chapters 2, 3, and 8 deal with the scientific method and what constitutes a good scientist. Chapters 4 to 7 identify some serious problems with the practice of science today. And chapters 9 to 11 propose ways of improving scientific practice.

The authors underscore the importance of objectivity for scientific progress. They also detail in chapter 5 the problem of advocacy, which has become acute with the utilization of science as a political tool. This is related to their defense of the scientific method versus scientists' opinions. Opinions by scientists do not constitute science despite the general belief that a scientific consensus is the best representation of scientific truth. Another interesting point in these times of extremely complex models guiding policies is the identification of complexity as a source of error.

This book is a nice, accessible addition to the philosophy of science following the steps of Karl Popper. The book's practical focus makes it more useful for science practitioners and those interested in the role of scientists in our society. If scientists are to have more voice (more power), it should come with more responsibility. Sadly, those that would benefit the most from this book are those that will not want to read it.
Customer image
Javier Vinós
5.0 out of 5 stars I wish this book was available at the start of my scientific career
Reviewed in Spain on October 9, 2022
Every scientist is convinced of his rationality, expertise, objectivity, and insight. However, studies demonstrate the general practice of science leaves much to be desired and, while being a general problem, in some fields it has resulted in a crisis of reproducibility.
As a scientist, I've been interested in the scientific method all my life, but I had to learn it the hard way, over many years of experimental practice from just a general understanding. I would have found a book like Armstrong and Green's "The Scientific Method" invaluable.

The book is divided into three parts. Chapters 2, 3, and 8 deal with the scientific method and what constitutes a good scientist. Chapters 4 to 7 identify some serious problems with the practice of science today. And chapters 9 to 11 propose ways of improving scientific practice.

The authors underscore the importance of objectivity for scientific progress. They also detail in chapter 5 the problem of advocacy, which has become acute with the utilization of science as a political tool. This is related to their defense of the scientific method versus scientists' opinions. Opinions by scientists do not constitute science despite the general belief that a scientific consensus is the best representation of scientific truth. Another interesting point in these times of extremely complex models guiding policies is the identification of complexity as a source of error.

This book is a nice, accessible addition to the philosophy of science following the steps of Karl Popper. The book's practical focus makes it more useful for science practitioners and those interested in the role of scientists in our society. If scientists are to have more voice (more power), it should come with more responsibility. Sadly, those that would benefit the most from this book are those that will not want to read it.
Images in this review
Customer image
Customer image
Manorly
4.0 out of 5 stars Some remarkable insights into how the world of science has been undermined by governments.
Reviewed in Canada on April 15, 2023
The "read" can be heavy with detail from time to time, however the revelations of how science should function in contrast with how it does function (in order to be politically correct that attracts a stream of funding) is truly eye-opening.